Monday 30 March 2020

The prophet is Nicholas but the emperor may have no clothes on at all


I’d like to explore two interrelated themes.

First theme. One of the “1066 and all that” historical factoids from my childhood was that King Canute commanded the tide to about turn. As presented to us in school  the intended message was about hubris, about the folly of the arrogance and stupidity that accompanies absolute power. Later on I learned that the situation was completely otherwise, and it was actually the king making a bit of a song and dance about admitting his powerlessness against God and nature, showing off his humility to his courtiers. Not such a juicy story of regal silliness after all.

Oh, and another thing about him. Back in the day, his name was spelled Canute, which was more obvious to pronounce and less typographically risky than the later preferred spelling.

Which leads us directly to the present day and first of all to Nicholas Nassim Taleb, author of such popular works as “The Black Swan” (2007) and “Antifragile” (2012), both highly pertinent to the present crisis. Our current black swan is not so much the coronavirus itself – we’ve had pandemic viruses before - but the almost unbelievable effects it has had on the entire planet, the deaths, the suffering, the destruction of livelihoods and of economies. I wonder, did anyone foresee the ramifications, the scale?

The most powerful man in the world, Donald J. Trump, some time ago declared that the US will be over the worst by Easter. I really hoped he was right, I really did, and at the most optimistic estimate he might just be, although the situation in parts of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and other states strongly suggests otherwise. Thus entirely voluntarily he invited his own Canute moment. He has since claimed that his comments were “aspirational”, that a false victory would be worse than no victory at all, and that it’s going to take rather longer. Perhaps, at last, he has realised that he is danger of being revealed as an emperor without clothes, no more powerful than the rest of us. Not good in an election year.

Second theme. Trends in recent times have been towards what Taleb calls fragility. A couple of instances. (1) Orthographically, Canute becomes Cnut – not important in itself, but symptomatic of a tendency; errors become less forgiving, more dangerous. (2) The massive (and some would say massively ugly) Forth rail bridge, built in 1890, continues – as it were - to go forth, while the slimline road bridge next door, built in 1964, has had its day. A startling physical representation of the issue; progress of a kind, but the result is that with the newer construction less is needed to go wrong before disaster or decay overtakes. Cleverer engineering; more style, less substance; added vulnerability. Take your choice.

OK, some drastic over-simplification with some random examples, but the common theme boils down to more or less the same thing - unwise parsimony as summarised by the expression “don’t put all your eggs in one basket”. In less colloquial language, in “Antifragile”, Taleb says “We have been fragilizing the economy, our health, political life, education, almost everything … by suppressing randomness and volatility”. So another angle on antifragility is that, while there is often a single most efficient way of doing something, to deny variety is to damage one’s survivability if things turn hostile. We adore efficiency, especially when it equates to profit. We plump for what seems the best option. Natural, but not entirely wise.

The trend is towards unwise slimming down, towards false economies, to corner cutting, to a loss of the robustness that comes with spare capacity, built-in redundancy, and adequate fail-safe mechanisms. 

There’s a trend also towards guaranteed obsolescence and waste. When I was growing up, if something broke, you (or your dad) mended it, after a fashion, and you could continue using it. Some small thingummyjig could be purchased from the local shop and inserted. Today, when something breaks, when – perhaps because it’s sealed in a plastic module and its workings are as incomprehensible as they are invisible - it cannot be repaired, it is completely and irretrievably broken, the whole thing, totally knackered, even if it’s just one tiny component that has failed – as, perhaps, it was designed to. So, it all gets thrown away - ultimately, we have learned, in many cases, providing something for marine creatures to get their teeth into. Then we buy a replacement, and so it goes on, same old mistake. 

Until one day when a replacement can’t be had for love nor money.

As the coronavirus crisis worsens everywhere, here in the UK the demand for ventilators and other life-saving equipment highlights the folly of making ourselves so vulnerable. Not, perhaps, that this particular requirement could realistically have been anticipated on this scale, and it’s probably unfair to pick on this, but more generally. Spreading things too thin. For strategically crucial items – not just in healthcare but in all aspects of our lives – there should never be a single source, a single supply chain, a single technology that permits of no alternatives or easy work-arounds. If any of these sources and systems fail, for whatever reason – disease, economic collapse, political hostility, criminality, warfare – the results can be catastrophic. Crudely, one thing buggers up everything else, the much derided domino effect. We should have learned that by now, the hard way. I hope so.

When we eventually recover from this terrible predicament we must reconfigure our economy and our industries to encourage greater self-sufficiency, to enhance robustness, and - to use Taleb’s word - to increase anti-fragility. Or, to use more familiar words, to be guided by safety and common sense. We must avoid dependency upon a single supplier, whether of raw materials, intermediate components, or finished products. 

The same proviso of robustness goes for all kinds of infrastructures and technologies, including those contributing to our intellectual, social and cultural lives. Never believe that the internet or some of its principal applications couldn’t have their black swan moment, their own version of the coronavirus. 

We must never allow ourselves to be this vulnerable again; we must always retain control, whether as countries or individuals. Or we will find ourselves in a situation where the emperor, naked as the day he was born, commands: “Alexa, Siri, shoot me in both feet”, only to hear the reply “Emperor, with respect sir, you’ve done that already. Now sir, it’s getting very dark. Would you like me to enable your light switch for you?”

No comments:

Post a Comment