My visits to art exhibitions are usually alone, or with a
close family member, and it’s rare that I’m accompanied by a friend. On
Saturday, however, such was the case at the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition, and
I found great pleasure in discussing what we liked and disliked, what worked
for us and what didn’t, comparing thoughts and observations.
Over many years I’ve attended the Summer Exhibition, not
infrequently leaving with the thought “never again”. Whatever one’s views on
art, whatever one’s tastes, it’s always quite an event, it’s sure to be
interesting, sometimes provocative and infuriating, and likely to be fun, as it
was exceptionally so last year, when curated by Grayson Perry. Though my friend
is a frequent visitor to traditional art exhibitions and collections, and even
at one time produced a bibliography of pop art, he finds that modern art,
so-called, too often leaves him (as it does me) with a reaction of “so what ?”
This was his first visit to a Summer Exhibition.
This year there was an underlying animal theme, plus
everything else one has grown to expect, from crude sociopolitical propaganda
right through to the yawn-inducing must-have “pile of old rubbish on the floor”
exemplar of the “pile of old rubbish on the floor” school of pretentiousness, plus
the usual Academicians with their increasingly tired views of splotchy skies
over the Channel or the Gove-haunted squares of South Kensington, on offer at
pisstakingly egotistical prices. Quite remarkably blatant were parodic updates
of Bruegel and Bosch, Hopper and Hamilton, Riley and Ruscha, in a show curated
by Jock McFadyen, or as the sponsor’s preface in the catalogue calls him, Jock
McFayden. Whatever his McMoniker, his evident painterly USP consists of large
indifferent skies separated from large indifferent foregrounds by a thin
horizontal band of decayed commercialised urbanised grot. What not to like ?
One of the purposes of art, allegedly, is to challenge the
status quo, but this year’s show lazily endorses the assumed left liberal metropolitan
stance on current subjects of concern and controversy, Brexit included, and could
have been compiled by the BBC. This year there were more paintings on display
than ever, climbing crazily up the walls well out of comfortable viewing range,
and there was some carelessness in what we are now supposed to call the
metadata. One work by George Shaw, of a wonderfully drab suburban back-lot
(Coventry, presumably), is transposed with its neighbour in the catalogue.
“Would I want it on my living room wall ?” and “would I want
to sit looking at it ?” are criteria my friend and I share. Well, I adore
tigers, but … “Does it make me dead jealous that I didn’t do it myself ?” is an
additional conceit of mine, and this year there was only one such qualifying work.
It didn’t grab me initially, but I photographed it, and only later did I get
the “wow” moment of awe and envy. The painting is called “Mayola”, and is by
Salvatore Fiorello. “Mayola” is an odd word; perhaps suggestive of a kind of
pandemic of paralysis and depression induced by a protracted spell of prime
ministerial uselessness, or alternatively a healthy brand of unsaturated fatty
acid-enriched cooking oil. What can it mean ?
“Mayola” (detail), Salvatore Fiorello
Oil on linen, on sale for £700, and featuring the backs of houses,
it’s very much my kind of thing. Since the catalogue no longer lists the
addresses of contributors – presumably in case enraged viewers want to get at
them and do them harm – there’s no clue as to where Signor Fiorello resides or operates,
and googling him elicits little. Like so many contributors to the Summer
Exhibition over the years, it appears that he’s conspicuously talented but
relatively unknown. My initial impression was that the subject of the painting
was somewhere in London, most probably East, just possibly South, an outside
chance of somewhere else. Pure guesswork, though informed by a lifetime of wandering
around such locations with their characteristic domestic vernaculars and subtly
unique ambiences. I took a gamble and consulted the A to Z. To my slight
surprise and considerable delight the index lists a Mayola Road in Clapton, E5,
not far from where my paternal grandmother spent part of her childhood. Yes,
that would fit, absolutely, spot on, although, as I say, it’s only a guess. There’s
no other Mayola in the capital.
No comments:
Post a Comment